
Stan Wawrinka stands as a steadfast figure during what is widely considered the most challenging era for male players on the ATP Tour.
He was consistently competing against three legendary players who quickly became recognized as some of the greatest in tennis history.
Roger Federer arrived first, soon followed by Rafael Nadal, and then Novak Djokovic emerged to shake things up.
Despite this, Andy Murray is frequently overlooked when conversations focus on the ascent of the Big Three.
Stan Wawrinka draws a comparison between Andy Murray and the rising stars Alcaraz and Sinner.
When Amazon Prime asked him to pick between the two players, Wawrinka responded with his usual generosity.
His very first match was against Juan Martin del Potro, and he immediately chose the Argentine.
He initially chose Lleyton Hewitt instead of Del Potro but quickly switched his pick to Murray when given the chance.
Here, he had the opportunity to contrast the past with the present, confidently selecting the 38-year-old over Jannik Sinner, David Ferrer, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Dominic Thiem, and Marat Safin.
Yet, when Carlos Alcaraz was introduced, he surprised everyone by choosing the four-time Grand Slam winner over Murray.
Ultimately, he concluded that Djokovic was the greatest player of all time in his view.
Andy Murray continues to be severely underrated.
Although it’s clear why many in the tennis world undervalue Murray, the numerous praises and frequent recognition from the Big Three should have shifted that perception by now.
Unfortunately, Murray is often overlooked, with many failing to fully appreciate the crucial role he played during an era of extraordinary dominance.
He not only secured three Grand Slam titles but is also the only male player to successfully defend Olympic gold in men’s singles, having defeated Roger Federer in the final at London—just a year before his landmark Wimbledon victory in 2013.
Looking back, history will remember Murray with respect, as he was denied Grand Slam victories eight more times by the Big Three—making it undeniable that no one faced greater obstacles because of their dominance, a key factor to consider when evaluating his legacy in tennis.
Leave a Reply